🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding that comments made by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment was understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive power on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players winning major titles when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just say his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {